Joe Biden just condemned America to more Chinese espionage, and worse
For almost two years now, the FBI has caught dozens of Chinese Communist Party spies who, while posing as graduate students and researchers at top academic institutions, have siphoned off the most advanced national defense equipment. of the United States for years. The spies, many undercover members of the Chinese military, had to approach to damage this grave and found their way unattended through America’s largely self-baby student visa and cultural exchange programs.
But on the eve of closing those national security loopholes, President Joe Biden rescinded the repair and instead gave a priceless gift to the People’s Liberation Army intelligence services: American vulnerability continues. What is at issue are the 1.5 million âJâ culture exchange visas and âFâ student visas active in any given year. Almost without media notice on July 6, Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) withdrew a September 2020 regulation from the Federal Register that the administration of former President Donald Trump had proposed to alleviate the espionage problem. and many others, such as the infiltration and immigration of foreign terrorists. fraud.
All of the arrested Chinese spies have used J and F visas to offload America’s top research institutions and their naÃ¯ve professors from their most sensitive and prized national defense research.
The proposed rule 2020-20845 was apolitical good governance that America sorely and clearly needed. He prominently cited the Chinese spy rampage along with terrorism and immigration fraud for forcing J and V visa holders from 59 countries to renew them every two or four years, which is enough to complete a graduate program or an average research project. The most valuable part of the process would have allowed DHS to conduct some very useful interviews with the renewal applicants. Officers would also collect biometric information, check progress at academic institutions, and recheck that initially claimed goals remained valid in the future.
This periodic regime would have put the first real basic government control over programs whose beneficiaries around the world have consistently benefited from indefinite self-declaration programs that allowed indefinite years of visa renewals largely without the possibility of close monitoring or security check. This system, for example, has allowed institutions that profit the most from captive, cheap research labor to let the U.S. government know that they want to renew visas. And nothing was in place for the government to verify when visa programs ended or changed beyond the scope initially claimed. Visa holders could live for years in the country without working or studying until they became illegally present.
In short, it was a recipe for regular immigration fraud, espionage, and Islamic terrorism. Perhaps, for example, a regulation like this would eliminate future F-1 visa overruns like Egyptian Khaled Awad, 24, who is accused of stabbing Rabbi Shlomo Noginsky on July 1 outside his synagogue in Boston and was involved in a previous anti-Semitic attack on a college roommate.
Khaled Awads’ discoveries would have been possible under the regulations put in place by Biden, which added a useful counterterrorism filter in the process where trained DHS officers could periodically assess whether student visa holders from countries at risk of terrorism, like Egypt, respected their end of the case or gave a good reason for the FBI investigative referrals. Keep in mind that F-1 visa holders have all too often committed terrorist crimes in the United States, including a number of 9/11 hijackers who entered with fake F student visas who have license to plot.
Other countries were listed among the 59 based on statistics showing that their citizens most often exceed their visas to live illegally in the United States, such as Nigeria, Haiti, Congo and Cameroon.
The now-dead regulation summed it all up simply: “These changes would ensure that the department has an effective mechanism to periodically and directly assess whether these non-immigrants are complying with the terms of their classifications and US immigration laws, and for obtain timely and accurate information about the activities in which they have engaged and plan to engage during their temporary stay in the United States.
What could be so terrible about all of this?
In its explanation, the Biden administration pointed out that 99% of those who commented on the settlement – many of them likely concerned foreigners, school administrators and visitor exchange programs – simply did not want to go through all the annoying muddles. for the security interests of their generous host country, such as showing up for an interview every four years and having to complete paperwork.
The settlement, opponents most often complained, “would burden them considerably” with additional costs and time, discriminate on the basis of nationality and deny them access to “immigration benefits”.
Placed in the context of the very real misdeeds of past and present Chinese espionage and foreign student terrorism, such justifications seem petty, irritating, selfish, and far from responding to a greater need for collective national security. While no one in the Biden administration can ever say it out loud, they killed this greater good for perhaps the smallest of reasons: Donald Trump is the one who proposed it.
It is music to the ears of the Chinese Communist Party.
Todd Bensman is Senior National Security Fellow, Center for Immigration Studies